Oh dear lord. Doesn't all lame keyloggers get written in VisualBasic? just asking...
[/td][/tr][/table]
DEC OCT HEX BIN Symbol HTML Number HTML Name Description 0 000 00 00000000 NUL Null char 1 001 01 00000001 SOH Start of Heading 2 002 02 00000010 STX Start of Text 3 003 03 00000011 ETX End of Text 4 004 04 00000100 EOT End of Transmission 5 005 05 00000101 ENQ Enquiry 6 006 06 00000110 ACK Acknowledgment 7 007 07 00000111 BEL Bell 8 010 08 00001000 BS Back Space 9 011 09 00001001 HT Horizontal Tab 10 012 0A 00001010 LF Line Feed 11 013 0B 00001011 VT Vertical Tab 12 014 0C 00001100 FF Form Feed 13 015 0D 00001101 CR Carriage Return 14 016 0E 00001110 SO Shift Out / X-On 15 017 0F 00001111 SI Shift In / X-Off 16 020 10 00010000 DLE Data Line Escape 17 021 11 00010001 DC1 Device Control 1 (oft. XON) 18 022 12 00010010 DC2 Device Control 2 19 023 13 00010011 DC3 Device Control 3 (oft. XOFF) 20 024 14 00010100 DC4 Device Control 4 21 025 15 00010101 NAK Negative Acknowledgement 22 026 16 00010110 SYN Synchronous Idle 23 027 17 00010111 ETB End of Transmit Block 24 030 18 00011000 CAN Cancel 25 031 19 00011001 EM End of Medium 26 032 1A 00011010 SUB Substitute 27 033 1B 00011011 ESC Escape 28 034 1C 00011100 FS File Separator 29 035 1D 00011101 GS Group Separator 30 036 1E 00011110 RS Record Separator 31 037 1F 00011111 US Unit Separator
little bit of source code (A)?
Good job bro ^^
Which little bit? :Pthe secret to your powers!
Thank you :D
@bubzuru - Thanks for the tip and table :D
I'm going to leave this here, I'll do a proper w/ text update in the morning * yawn *
(http://i49.tinypic.com/u4yky.png)
Oh dear lord. Doesn't all lame keyloggers get written in VisualBasic? just asking...
Developing a more serious virus, you cannot rely on what people _should_ have installed in order for the malware to run. Unless you are targeting a very specific module, but that's another story.just code in C, with CodeBlocks? or something like that, then you dont have the .net reference applied on standard
My point is, if you are creating something that you will later have to get data from without end-user knowing and you won't have complete control over it, you cannot rely on "if" factors. It needs to be solid. And .NET, Java or anything else that takes up vital organs in an executable does not qualify as solid.
But you probably all know that already.
Indeed Delphi is nice. Borland Delphi 7 is still the shit :D Embarcadero 2010 is also nice, but Delphi7 seems faster to me and more lightweight.
Developing a more serious virus, you cannot rely on what people _should_ have installed in order for the malware to run. Unless you are targeting a very specific module, but that's another story.Exactly. Precisely my point. If you are going to rely on "ifs" your entire success expectations are flawed and you should rather think "I would have secured my success IF I had been coding for a broader audience", such as native code that runs without any frameworks at all!
My point is, if you are creating something that you will later have to get data from without end-user knowing and you won't have complete control over it, you cannot rely on "if" factors. It needs to be solid. And .NET, Java or anything else that takes up vital organs in an executable does not qualify as solid.
But you probably all know that already.
Indeed Delphi is nice. Borland Delphi 7 is still the shit :D Embarcadero 2010 is also nice, but Delphi7 seems faster to me and more lightweight.I have been following Delphi since Delphi 2 (1996, a real jewel). Delphi 7 Enterprise I have, and then I followed up with RAD Studio 2010 and XE2. Without going off topic, I agree with you here again, Delphi 7 is the most balanced one, sadly it's not anymore fully compatible with newer Windows versions, I had to downgrade compatibility with Vista (and of course went back to XP in a week or so) when there was no Windows 7. I once tried to give a test-drive to Kylix 3, but I just can't be bothered to install it.