EvilZone

Function readlines() puts lines of file to list, so when you do:
r = requests.get(content+"'")
You are trying to add string " ' " to a list and request whole list. I wonder how you didn't get error there?
Basically you should do something like this:

import requests
with open("URL_list.txt", 'r') as f:
    content = f.readlines()

for url in content:
   #strip() strips newline characters.
    if "SQL" in requests.get(url.strip()+"'").content:
        print '\033[1;31mVulnerable!'
    else:
        print '\033[1;32mFailed.'


Code: [Select]

file = open("imperva.txt", "r")

tosearch= 'cmd'
str(tosearch)

for line in file:
if tosearch in line:
print line
print '\033[1;31mVulnerable!'

else:
print '\033[1;32mFailed.'


Using with statement when opening file is good practise to do because it handles files closing etc.
That..
str(tosearch)
..doesn't do anything. Or atleast it doesn't save what it does to anywhere, also it's pointless because 'tosearch' -variable is string already.

Switch to tty console and try to login there and if you are able to login, undo what ever you did to the login screen.

ALT+CTRL+F might have been key combo in mint to switch tty.

You obviously have failed at actually trying. One of the first things all python tutorials teach you is how to ask the user for raw_input

Just wanted to point out that if op is using python3 then input() is valid instead of raw_input().

But I get that usually when people use just word "python" they mean python2.


edit: Just noticed that techb already pointed this out.

Google
Google
Google
/Bos

I don't really see the point of advicing someone to use google when title clearly states that OP was trying to start discussion instead of asking directly  advice. Google is great for many things, but wouldn't count it as great discussion partner yet. Tho, OP should have answered to his own questions to really start the discussion.

what vpn do you use?
if you run your own, why and how?
otherwise, what do you think makes your vpn better?

^{people who say "none" or "hola" will be laughed at}

I have used PIA( https://www.privateinternetaccess.com ) for sometime now. Actually I think it was after d4rkcat posted this script related to PIA when I started to use their services. Can't really say why it might be better than some other similiar highly rated services, but atleast I have been happy with it.

I do have my own OpenVPN setup also but it serves totally different purpose than PIA as it doesn't really give anykind of anonymity to me and it's not it purpose in any way as the openvpn server is VPS that points quit directly to me.

I would say it's bit funny to compare VPN  providers services to running own VPN server, cause I would imagine that most time use purposes for those are really different like in my case. Unless  VPN server is some bitcoin bought VPS for example. But if I had that kind of box, i would most likely just use it as private proxy via "ssh -D" and then run stuff that needs go through it with proxychains , instead of setting VPN server. More experienced people in these setups might have something wiser to say.

Of course if you "hang out" lot in open wifis or something and do personal stuff then both own and bought vpn service serves same security purpose. If theres is no anonymity side considered, but privacy in LAN only then I would more likely use own VPN server. But I never really use open wifis, unless I'm the one that intends to be malicious in that network . [emoji14]

Anws what I advise you to do is to install arch, then install blackarch's repos like this u'll have over 500 tools to download when u need them without the Kali and friends bloated crap, also U'll have a legit distro you can use everyday

^This:

Same thing with kali, use debian+kali's repos if you need something from kali's toolkit. But with arch you might not even need those blackarch repos, because most likely AUR already has most of the stuff you need/you think you need.

Okay I looked into it quickly because I got curious what's the deal here. I encountered same problem as you after installing hamster-sidejack and ferret-sidejack packets from repositories(I used nexus7+nethunter).

Here is quick workaround I made for it to work and some steps of what I made to "solve" the issue. But still consider what I said in end of my previous post.

What I did first:
ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep 'ferret\|hamster'

Output:
-rwxr-xr-x.  1 root root     279164 Oct  3  2013 ferret
lrwxrwxrwx.  1 root root         33 Jan 15  2013 hamster -> ../share/hamster-sidejack/hamster

So it seems that ferret exists in /usr/bin and hamster is symlinked from "/usr/share/hamster-sidejack/". After some testing I figured that for some reason it seemed that you had to be in same directory with ferret even if it's in your "PATH" when you run the hamster. Maybe "execle()" function works bit in same manner as doing "./ferret" so it tries to execute file from your cwd instead of just calling the ferret or something, idk.

So next steps:
cd /usr/share/hamster-sidejack/
cp /usr/bin/ferret .
chmod 755 ferret
hamster
Now when running hamster inside "/usr/share/hamster-sidejack/" everything seems to work. Like I said it's more a workaround than exact fix. Basically you could just cd to /usr/bin/ but it'a not really good solution as ferret seems to save .pcap files in your current working dir. To run hamster  from anywhere you could just make some small script like this:
#!/bin/bash
cd /usr/share/hamster-sidejack/
hamster
Save it as "call_hamster" or anything you want and move it to /usr/bin/(With right permissions).

EDIT: To answer your question I did use quick format.

Then I think the same think applies even if it's uefi machine.  GPT actually stores boot data in multiple places on drive unlike the MBR would and the EPP has propably encrypted all that, so  it's even more likely to give you trouble if you don't correctly wipe the drive and that way get rid of EEP's bootloader.

So just do as OE 800 suggested and use diskpart.

@OE 800 . Not sure if you meant those instructions in that diskpart link to be used in this case, but wouldn't those most likely just left the same issues as it's instructing only to do quick format once again and then to create new primary partition in unallocated space.  Don't have much experience on diskpart myself, but isn't it needed to use "clean" or even "clean all" in this case?