1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Then read this
Liked it very much and was the detailed guide I've ever seen.
http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=24722
Not necessarily. People are pretty much getting caught cause of poor OPSEC and correlation attacks(esp correlation attacks due to bad OPSEC).
The game becomes a bit harder for the gov folk if your browser is locked down and your just being a client. Running a hidden service is a bit of a different ballpark and takes a significant comb over to make sure you are running a tight crib. Even the NSA admitted in their slides that something like TAILS + TOR is basically GG and labeled a 'critical threat to the potential of intercepting encrypted communications' or some shizzle like that.
The key to dodging correlation attacks is seperation of duties. In other words, apply common sense and then apply the logical extremes. You shouldn't hack from home, ergo you shouldn't do ANYTHING related to yo extracurricular shenanigans remotely near your house. And don't be bringing home there either. No facebook at the same MCDonalds you been poppin boxen at, even if you be using a diff laptop real slick like, ya feel me?
Back to da topic at hand, I'd still go with TOR over Freenet for going hard in the paint, if only mo mofos be lookin at it real good ya feel me? I know what how the NSA attacks TOR, I dont how the NSA would attack Freenet. The devil ya know, amirite?
Freenet is nothing more than another overlay network. They are all pretty similar in terms of delivering access to networks other than the Internet, but neither are very useful for government anonymity.
Sup evilzone.
I am interested in some opinions here.
Last year linux has been under fire for being not as secure as we would like it to be.
Perhaps the arch is inherently more secure than say windows , but I am worried.
Thinking about making a full switch to BSD , point is that I am not sure if I would be better off.
Only thing I don't like is the lack of 'new hw' support and less software to play with.
I played around with BSD's before and know my way around for the most part.
Any thoughts?
It is mainly based of the fact that Kali's older brother Backtrack was not safe to run as a normal OS (always on root etc). They made Kali in a way that it is a normal debian distro modified to be a pentest distribution.
Though in the end we will always discourage beginners to go ahead and install Kali and try out the nifty tools, which is basically a fucking bad idea.