EvilZone

THIS IS BLASPHEMY! I hope you are ashamed of yourself Sir!

I got...health problems from drinking too much. Otherwise, nothing for the 5th year in a row. To include receiving a card.

/offtopic Hahaha, shit son. Me and DarkVision are gonna crew up and make the biggest wall of text known to man.

Idk...Recon has you guys beat already with "Dr. Noire."

-ohai-
This is not my first nick. I did a lot of really stupid shit under an old nick. Some things were good, some were really really ignorant and honestly, quite immature. I'm not saying I've grown up much since then, but as time has gone on, I've changed. First, m0rph was my idea for a never ending rampage across the internet, then it was misguided vigilantism (my golden years), now it's just to find a meaningful purpose for my life. Thus, m0rph, doesn't mean any one thing in particular. Today, it can be one thing, tomorrow it could have a different meaning. That's the beauty of change. It's an idea that you can morph your life in any way you desire.

As a seasoned veteran, I am in agreement with iTpHo3NiX. Atheros makes the best wireless chipsets, period. Realtek is mediocre, but don't ever buy Broadcom (unless you like proprietary drivers that don't support packet injection, then by all means).

Having the usb device set in VM -> Settings -> USB has stopped my host OS from having it show up as an adapter and it went straight to my VM.

I will give you a +1 right here, right now, if you can explain why that happened. I will give you a hint: ring.

But if the admin enable MAC filtering or IP filtering the router must have an open port that just let special MAC or IP for connect to it remotely. Can these ports Ability to find?

Please read this first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model

So, as you can see from the OSI model. MAC filtering takes place at layer 2, IP filtering takes place at layer 3, and ports operate at layer 4. Therefor, it is entirely possible for a router to not have any open ports, and still be able to route, filter macs, and other basic network-relevant malarkey.

So when you throw in a scenario where an admin logs into a device that appears to not have any open ports, that's exactly a farse. In those cases, access is allowed or disallowed via filtered ports - ports that are neither open, nor closed, they are filtered by a firewall. That's not entirely accurate either though, because a port doesn't actually listen in a "filtered" state, but rather the firewall filters datagrams depending on rulesets and sends a reject message if the datagram isn't allowed.

So if you run a scan, and it says "all X ports are closed" what it actually means is that the host 1) doesn't have daemons/services listening on the port range you specified 2) is either logically or physically inaccessible from you or 3) is up, but because you were able to resolve an address with ARP it is actually up and legitimately doesn't have any listening daemons/services listening on the network you share with it which is where the suggestions proxx gave you would came into play (vlans, ACLs, IP filtering, so on and so forth).

Although $800 is a bit too much for my wallet, I think it could be a good investment and really helpful in finding myself a nice job in the area! Do you guys know anything about the academic recognition of this course?

ISC2 will award 40 CPE credits for completing this course.

See? You don't have an illness, that's all I was talkin about.. In fact I only suggested to not compare some wannabe eccentric faggot behaviour with an actual disease- Thereby refering to mental illnesses in general, not your alleged anti-social bullshit

You're right, I don't have an illness. I have a personality disorder, and I don't have to prove anything to some random kid over the internet who has a history of raging at people without listing facts to back up his/her rants.

You copied my accusation, good job. Besides, if I had criticized you "blindly", I would not have considered to use the quote function. You, kid, are perfectly sane, and therefore should stfu

You have criticized blindly by not quoting anything from the DSM-V to prove that I do not have any issues. Your failure at reading comprehension astounds me and makes me assume you are not a native English speaker. Also, it is perfectly possible to be both completely sane, and have a blatant disregard for the rules of society and people's safety, while going out of your way to do it when it suits you.

Whatever, but I doubt that you got mine. yeah you so cool and give no fucks and bla, you > me and bla. We will quit this here, you bore me

I probably didn't get yours. I don't understand people in general. When in doubt, mimicry is the ultimate form of flattery. Nobody has to prove anything to you to get your approval, and certainly myself included. It is you who have decided to derail this thread. There are people here with actual illnesses that would like to talk about their issues, and you are here just causing up a shit storm with a widely revered member (me) over nothing...aside from your inability to read and comprehend. Thanks, come again for our crispy burnt Nigger McNuggets.