EvilZone

It is odd to me  that when I asked if there is a check on admin power in any way, people got angry.
If you read my posts in this thread, you will notice that I never accused any individual mod, or the mods on here in general of silencing anyone, or of abusing their mod power.
I never stated that I felt like I was silenced myself, or in any way targeted or treated unfairly.

This thread is about some changes to policy in regards to censorship, and extension of moderation power (I understand mods could always remove posts, this thread is talking about increasing mod censorship) and whenever something like that comes up in a forum, or any community it is always prudent to discuss ways to protect all forum or community members (even countries have constitutions or other documents that lay out methods to try to ensure fair use of leadership powers).

Do you really not read anything I've posted? Doesn't matter if an Mod-Owner silence you. They can do so without this change. Our rules have always been up to interpretation by the staff. If you don't like it you can GTFO. Nothing changes for users with over 5 posts, everything else is the same. Dunno why I need to keep repeating myself.

Why  the hostility here? Why turn to insults?
It is sentiments like this that make me concerned that mod abuse of power could potentially be a problem.
Apparently some mods are not secure enough to handle a lowly member of community  questioning their ideas. Lack of being open to criticism is a pretty sever flaw for leaders to have.
Again, I want to point out that nowhere in my previous posts on this thread did I insult anyone, or make any accusations. So those kind of insulting, heavy handed replies are pretty unnecessary,

Questions for clarification purposes:

Would the moderation que be handled by one particular admin, or will multiple admins be working on it?
If it was only one admin, that could be problematic for a couple of reasons; for one that could be a lot for one person alone  to have to read through and process. Perhaps that won't be an issue here, as it doesn't seem like there are tons of posts..... something to consider though.
Also, if it is one person only, what safeguards are in place to keep that person from using that power to silence posters they don't agree with, or don't like?

Also, is there a guide that details the exact grounds a post can be denied on, or is it entirely up to the whim and preference of  whichever mod is tasked with approving posts?

This playlist is good background noise:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qKMY6VDk1U&list=PLF2104B81764D5F0A

You could carry a "smiley."
These are typically a bandanna tied to a lock, a lock on a chain, or something similar.
The great thing about a smiley is that neither a lock, nor a bandanna are illegal to possess in most states, so if you are going to be searched by law enforcement, just slide the lock off the bandanna.

Great answer Biohazard.

I think part of the reason this question comes up so often is that while all roads may lead to the same objective destination, everyone learns differently. So a person may read numerous threads on the same topic, and try various answers, and not find one that clicks for them. So they ask other people, hoping to get a suggestion that works for them. 
You are absolutely correct that the best way to truly learn any subject is to practice and use the knowledge yourself instead of just asking others. That is why it is so problematic the way the school system (at least in the US) works. We are taught to listen to "experts" and follow their instructions, not to critically think about a problem and figure out how to solve it.

You tried to warn them, several times in fact.
Why not exploit the weaknesses you found for your own advantage? If they don't respect you enough to at lest investigate your claims, then why respect them or their data?

What you would have to do is create your own python interpreter with the source code hard coded and then compile that all into an executable yourself.  (write the interpreter in C++ or something).  Basically it's so much more work than just using C++ it's so unfeasible that I would never even attempt to do it.

I know this is an old post, but it is a topic others will likely continue to read, and this is flat out wrong.
There are existing methods to do this for you, such as py2exe (http://www.py2exe.org/)

Well if the police has access to a store's CCTV the staff can be easily seen throwing a homeless guy out, who wanted to buy something legally with money. Without CCTV, they can just tell the police he was causing problems and they'll eat it. So that argument is invalid I'd say.
Same thing with drunks. It's bullshit thinking that once you caused some problems you won't be able to enter any store, anymore. If they don't let you in, they need a reason. And the police is there to see if the reason was a good one, else they can punish the seller.
So yeah, maybe what you're saying is that with the current laws this wouldn't really go well and perhaps that's right.
But introducing the proper regulations before facewatch would make it completely acceptable.

I am not sure where you live, so I can not claim to have knowledge of how the law works there.
I can, however, speak from experience as to how the law works where I live (The US). While small details vary from state to state, stores are not public property, so employees can make you leave for almost any reason (the exception being things like race or disability).
The other thing is let's say the cops review the cctv footage (which may or may not have sound) and don't see the person doing anything, the store employee can claim that they said something profane or obscene, and to avoid other customers getting offended, made the person leave. Coming up with an excuse really isn't hard.
And unless you have the money to fight it in court (and most homeless people don't) there is really nothing you can do about it.