Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Used Band-Aid

Pages: [1]
1
General discussion / Re: Any Musicians?
« on: October 11, 2012, 03:55:00 am »
Damn I always wanted to play the violin.  Trumpet's pretty fun, but I guess it's just not the same as it used to be for me.  There's a crappy piece of shit keyboard in my house that I play around on in my spare time, but hell, it's better than nothing, right?  Even so, playing the piano feels amazing.  If the piano didn't suck so much, I could sit for hours learning songs on it (I've already done that a few times actually).  Not to mention that it makes me appreciate decent pianos that much more.

2
General discussion / Re: Any Musicians?
« on: October 11, 2012, 02:16:34 am »
I've played bass for 4 years, trumpet for 6, and I recently took up piano about 6 months ago, but I dunno if you'd count that haha.  I usually practice for like half an hour before bed every night.  Really, I'll play just about anything except country. 

3
General discussion / Re: euthanasia, right or wrong?
« on: October 08, 2012, 07:23:43 am »
So, as per euthanasia in general, I'd say I'm for it, but it always depends on the circumstances.  I mean, when I was little, my parents had my cat euthanized because he was old.  REALLY old.  He'd even stopped grooming himself, and was having trouble defending himself from wild cats, but I'm sure he wouldn't have wanted to die.  It might've meant more work for me, keeping him clean and safe and such, but how could i be sure of what he'd wanted?  From their point of view, he was suffering.  But he had love.  He had food, shelter, "friends", in the form of other cats.  However, it was impossible to go and ask him if he wanted to be put down.  And it is there that the main difference between human and animal euthanasia lies.  One can "think for itself" and we "take responsibility" for the other.

  Was he really so different from the elderly "suffering" in the nursing homes of the world?  If those humans were animals, they'd have been put down long ago.  Objectively thinking, why should a bunch of humans who can no longer care for themselves exist?  They no longer "serve a purpose", so to speak, in our society.  What good do they do?  Sure, they give us advice and such, but does anyone know how much money is put into nursing homes worldwide?  I certainly don't, but I can imagine that it could find many other uses.  I'm not saying that we should euthanize our parents and grandparents just to save money - as I stated earlier, this is my objective view.

Why do we have such a hard time with euthanization?  Everything dies eventually.  Of course, circumstances are, as always, a key asset in this regard.  Such as, to say, if someone suffered a head injury, and became a "vegetable", so to speak.  There is no doubt in my mind that she/he should be euthanized.  It is literally a waste of all our resources to keep a body alive like that (in this situation, at least).  If the body is all that is left, perhaps with a couple senses intact, then why keep a mindless body alive?  Because we want to spend more time with an unresponsive "vegetable" that is beyond anything that medical science can do for?  We really are greedy; keeping a body alive to make ourselves feel better, even though it will still eventually die.  Prolonging the process by which it does will only make it harder to accept in the end.

There are many elderly people out there in this world who will suffer from Alzheimer's.  For those of you not familiar with it, it is basically the gradual deterioration of basic brain functions, usually due to old age.  They forget things: where they live, how old they are, who they are.  Eventually, they will even forget things like having to breathe.  Then, they die.  If I were to visit an Alzheimer's victim, and tell them that she/he was going to be euthanized for various reasons, how do you suppose they would react?  Would they accept death, thinking that they'd lived their life already; or would they reject it, thinking that they still have somewhere to go in life?

Euthanization is hard because it means the loss of someone we care about.  But why do we euthanize in the first place?  In the case of animals, it might be because it is what we think is best for them; or it might be that we simply don't have the resources to take care of them; or even that we are simply lazy and don't want to have to put in the time and effort into keeping them alive.  But what about people?  It's hard to say that we kill off the elderly because it saves money, or because we're lazy.  Sometimes, it's because we love them.  He honor their request for death, and deliver it upon them.  But it is that same emotion that makes it hard to decide in their place. When it comes time to decide if they would want to live as an empty shell, draining resources from humanity, with no chance for recovery, what do we do?

 I've seen people mourn the deaths of animals and other people alike, and I'll go ahead and say that I haven't noticed a huge difference.  There might be a big religious ceremony held for the death of a loved one, and for an animal, perhaps a hastily dug hole in your backyard.  Chances are, more people will mourn the death of another human than would for an animal.  But either way, the emotional pain fades with time (given that everyone takes death differently and mourns in their own way), and soon, we accept the death as a part of reality.  Death is eternal, and life continues on, eternally impacted with the past actions of that individual (regardless of being human or otherwise, although human impacts tend greatly to be more affecting).

I do apologize for the ranting :)  And thus I end my little speech the same why I began it; generally speaking, I am all for euthanasia.  However, there are some boundaries that should not be crossed, and we should all try, not as humans, but as living beings, to see the lives of other living things in a new light.  Life cannot be replaced; be careful who, or what, you euthanize. 

4
Creative Arts / Re: Protesting the new cybercrime law in the philippines
« on: October 08, 2012, 06:16:16 am »
Well, I guess I see how it is, for the most part.  Libel really shouldn't be a criminal offense, although I've seen how it can be hurtful to people.  The main problem with libel is that people would sometimes rather believe what they hear to be the truth, rather than scrutinizing it up close for the facts.  There might even be a bunch of really good shit in this bill, but since this one part is controversial, the rest is mostly disregarded; and thus, people call for the absolute repeal of it, rather than simply amending the part that offends them (or what have you).

5
Creative Arts / Re: Protesting the new cybercrime law in the philippines
« on: October 08, 2012, 05:28:14 am »
Interesting statement.  I'm not exactly knowledgeable as what's going on all the way over there, but judging by what this says, I'd probably side with with ya.  However, I don't think I can really protest it when I'm thousands of miles away.  Or maybe I can?  :D

But, I do feel that this applies to many things, especially now, in our age of "politics".  It's almost become a universal truth of our time.  Criticizing a system that already works, but could be better, for example.  Or your schoolteacher.  Or your friend's mom. 

Not that these are considered cybercrime, but I like to think that the concept is similar, if not the same, in a sense. 

6
General discussion / Re: Scary Games
« on: October 08, 2012, 03:41:57 am »
I was going to suggest those, but then it occurred to me that you'd JUST named them all off.  I got nothing D:

Actually, Obscure:  The Aftermath was really fucked up lol, about all I know, idk if you'd call Resident Evil scary in the same sense either, but it surprised me at times (the 4th one, that is)

7
Creative Arts / Re: The Music Thread
« on: October 07, 2012, 08:27:00 pm »
Linkin Park - In the End

Haha normally I listen to more techno/dubstep music, but Linkin Park will always be #1 for me.  It all started when I was 6...

8
Science / Antimatter, anyone?
« on: October 04, 2012, 05:23:29 am »
So I was talking with my chemistry teacher about, well...physics, of all things.  I was trying to anyway.  He was pretty cool about it though, even though he had no reply for my why antimatter-matter reactions occur.  So before I go and consult a nuclear physicist (because I'll never remember to) I'll just throw it out there.  Why is it that matter and antimatter annihilate one another?  What is it that is so catastrophically different about the two, yet causes them to appear so similar? 

An idea of mine is that, if string theory is true, that perhaps matter and antimatter are generated as result of string vibrating in opposite values to one another.  I don't know a whole lot about vibrations of this sort, or if such an idea (as "opposite" or "reciprocal" vibration) is even applicable.  The idea is that the observed annihilation of mass could be the result the vibrations of two strings, one having an opposite (or such a relation) value to the other, "interacting" with one another.  Since they have polar vibrations, so to speak, they would, in a sense, "cancel out" the vibrations of each other.  Assuming that all (or a great majority) of the energy that was being put into causing the string to vibrate was released as a result of the cancellation of the vibration, and that the vibration of the string is what causes matter/antimatter to appear to exist, then the absence of said vibration would, in turn, cause the matter to have disappeared; to have been completely converted into electromagnetic radiation energy (or some other form).

Now, I know that's a lot to take in.  Or maybe not.  Maybe nothing I said made the slightest sense.  I'm sure some of you understand my own ideas better than I do, but the only way to find out for sure is to discuss our ideas!  Yay!

I'd love to hear any other ideas about antimatter and such.  Feel free to criticize my logic (if there is any :P).  Enjoy discovering a little something about the universe as we do not know it.

Pages: [1]