Whats wrong with Ubuntu? I was gonna use it as my 'crossover', so just asking
Well, the last Ubuntu I've ever used was Ubuntu 12.04(Precise Pangolin) and besides the fact that the interface is funky and gay, I just don't like it because it's slow, crashes randomly, it looks like a fucking cellphone, and it's just too "user friendly".
To be honest, if I had to boil it down to one tiny instance or fact, I would choose Ubuntu's error messages. What happens in a regular *nix when somethings fails, or goes wrong, or you do something wrong? It usually gives you a verbose error message that you can't really understand unless if you have *nix experience. Ubuntu on the other hand, it just gives you a pop-up box telling you that an unexpected error has occurred. No information or anything like that. Sounds a bit like Windows doesn't it?
Now which would you rather have:
- An error that you might not understand,
but, if you take a little time to research, you can fix the problem.
OR- A very friendly and human-readable error message,
but, there is absolutely no information given on what you might be able to look into to fix it and you find yourself clicking the troubleshoot button which then tells you that a cable is unplugged which you then check and realize that you were never actually using cables and it's all wireless so you then download some "user friendly" programs that promise to fix the error which then tell you to register so then you do and then you end up spending $29.95 when you should have just downloaded a better OS.
EDIT: This in no way is a reflection on older Ubuntu's such as 10.04. Ubuntu wasn't always a complete piece of poopie