Author Topic: Linux RAT  (Read 10343 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline proxx

  • Avatarception
  • Global Moderator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2803
  • Cookies: 256
  • ФФФ
    • View Profile
Re: Linux RAT
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2015, 03:16:09 pm »
Thanks for introducing this, gonna use it. Its nothing new but cool to see shit like this for nix.
[update] I just tried using prey on my ubuntu machine and its a bitch to setup.
Software repo doesn't install it. So you have to cd /usr/lib/prey/current/bin/ && sudo ./prey config gui. Now it'll run only when you run the script. Restart and it won't run, you have to set it to run on boot.
The problem is between chair and screen.
Wtf where you thinking with that signature? - Phage.
This was another little experiment *evillaughter - Proxx.
Evilception... - Phage

Offline v32itas

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Posts: 123
  • Cookies: -4
  • coup de grâce
    • View Profile
Re: Linux RAT
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2015, 04:30:22 pm »
Yeah basically what Proxx said is all you need. Since you opt to use linux, then you should use linux tools and forget about RATs. SSH is basically the tool you want to use, but in case of theft, I would recommend projects such as http://preyproject.com/ that are built specifically for that purpose.
nice share +1
"There is nothing more deceptive then an obvious fact." - SH

“There was no such thing as a fair fight. All vulnerabilities must be exploited.”
― Cary Caffrey





Offline Stackprotector

  • Administrator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2515
  • Cookies: 205
    • View Profile
Re: Linux RAT
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2015, 05:05:54 pm »
~Factionwars

Offline Polyphony

  • VIP
  • Knight
  • *
  • Posts: 178
  • Cookies: 23
    • View Profile
Re: Linux RAT
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2015, 11:40:20 pm »
The problem is between chair and screen.

This really can't be taught enough to the folks here who post these kinds of threads/questions.  OP may not even know what a rootkit is.  Hell, they may not even know what SSH is, but the best way to go about solving the issue is to think of what you want to accomplish and figure out the tools you'll need to get that done.

This is a positive side-effect of a common unix philosophy called "KISS", which stands for "Keep it simple, stupid."  When you have a task that needs to get done (in your case remote administration) the working end-result will often be a multi-component solution with each piece of software having their own straightforward purpose.

It will almost never be a single huge file you download off of the internet, w/ a next-next-finish interface, that'll let you open up built in text-to-speech software on your friends computer over the internet.  Sorry to break it to you.  :-\
Code: [Select]
<Spacecow_> for that matter I have trouble believing bitches are made out of ribs
<Gundilido> we are the revolutionary vanguard fighting for the peoples right to display sombrero dawning poultry
<Spacecow> did they see your doodle?
<~phage> Maybe
<+Unresolved> its just not creative enough for me
<+Unresolved> my imagination is to big to something so simple

Offline Darkvision

  • EZ's Fluffer
  • VIP
  • Royal Highness
  • *
  • Posts: 755
  • Cookies: 149
  • Its not a bug, It's a Chilopodas.
    • View Profile
Re: Linux RAT
« Reply #19 on: May 16, 2015, 08:33:27 am »
This really can't be taught enough to the folks here who post these kinds of threads/questions.  OP may not even know what a rootkit is.  Hell, they may not even know what SSH is, but the best way to go about solving the issue is to think of what you want to accomplish and figure out the tools you'll need to get that done.

This is a positive side-effect of a common unix philosophy called "KISS", which stands for "Keep it simple, stupid."  When you have a task that needs to get done (in your case remote administration) the working end-result will often be a multi-component solution with each piece of software having their own straightforward purpose.

It will almost never be a single huge file you download off of the internet, w/ a next-next-finish interface, that'll let you open up built in text-to-speech software on your friends computer over the internet.  Sorry to break it to you.  :-\

KISS is a good philosophy on life, but you would be surprised how often even highly knowledgeable people miss something simple, ive done it, and had it pointed out to me. I've done it, and figured out days weeks months or years later that holy shit i could have done that so much easier/faster with knowledge i already had...or ive also pointed it out to others. Not saying we dont have a lot of questions here that should have been googled first, then maybe clarified here after. but his orginal post didnt seem totally off base, just that he didnt realize their was so many utilities built in that could do what he was looking for. In other words he may be new to linux, but is at least familiar enough with what he wanted to do windows wise, but wasnt sure about how to do it in linux, and the terminology he used may have been problematic for searching. So i dont see this one as "obviously dumb" as you seem to be implying. To give a good example of this...

A while back (re years ago) i was a member of one of those DIY/self help forums, it was one of the larger ones and i enjoyed the layout, and the fact that over all the people contributing knowledge were very much in the know. For instance i got some car help that i had NOT yet been able to figure out on my own, or with google, that some seriously experienced mechanics helped me to find the solution. Obviously one of the areas i helped in constantly was the computer section. Anyway someone came with the the age old "i forgot my password to my server...uh oh" and by the time i got to it their had been ~5 or so replys on different ways they could break into this windows 2k server without FUBARing it or otherwise destroying data, some of them were...insanely detailed. In other words they were not dumb responses in the sense of right or wrong, every one of them showed a great deal of familiarity with the OS/what the user needed. But every one of them took at least 30 minutes to implement. In comes my post "just use a recovery disk like bartpe(+ link)" chorus from all the sysadmins before me "oh shit why didnt i think of that...". It is not always lack of knowledge, but a difference in viewpoint that makes all the difference. People here posted to shift his viewpoint on what he was looking to do, and im sure (assuming he came back to look at this thread again, which im guessing he did) he learned a lesson.
The internet: where men are men, women are men, and children are FBI agents.

Ahh, EvilZone.  Where networking certification meets avian fecal matter & all is explained, for better or worse.

<Phage> I used an entrence I never use

Offline Polyphony

  • VIP
  • Knight
  • *
  • Posts: 178
  • Cookies: 23
    • View Profile
Re: Linux RAT
« Reply #20 on: May 25, 2015, 04:10:47 pm »
Perhaps you're right Darkvision, I got a little carried away with that post (but i didn't feel like deleting it in the end  :D ).  OP, after re-reading the thread it seems I wasn't even interested in discussion, but you've come to the conclusion that you shouldn't ever worry about setting up a backdoor on a linux machine, and only focus on Windows boxes?  (I'm pretty sure that's what you meant anyways) I'd have to ask what about when you r00t that *nix server and you have practiced setting up hidden remote access in only Windows environments?  This doesn't fit the original use-case of fucking around w/ your friends computer but maybe the original question wasn't as dumb as you thought it was. :D 

Also, my pevious irritation was aimed at "jitterbud" not you m8.
Code: [Select]
<Spacecow_> for that matter I have trouble believing bitches are made out of ribs
<Gundilido> we are the revolutionary vanguard fighting for the peoples right to display sombrero dawning poultry
<Spacecow> did they see your doodle?
<~phage> Maybe
<+Unresolved> its just not creative enough for me
<+Unresolved> my imagination is to big to something so simple

Offline DigitalCorrosion

  • /dev/null
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Cookies: -3
    • View Profile
Re: Linux RAT
« Reply #21 on: August 05, 2015, 03:43:35 am »
Well I agree with most on the RAT discussion. You should take a look at Veil Framework if you wanna build a payload quickly with little detections. There are some pretty good tutorials on how to use it as well as there own information on there website. Just throwing it out there.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2015, 03:44:49 am by DigitalCorrosion »

Offline iTpHo3NiX

  • EZ's Pirate Captain
  • Administrator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2920
  • Cookies: 328
    • View Profile
    • EvilZone
Re: Linux RAT
« Reply #22 on: August 05, 2015, 06:10:21 am »
ssh
</thread>
[09:27] (+lenoch) iTpHo3NiX can even manipulate me to suck dick
[09:27] (+lenoch) oh no that's voluntary
[09:27] (+lenoch) sorry