What the f**k is wrong with black arch

[blackarchmaniac_12]

Hey guys can you please tell me how to install blackarch linux on hard disk ...
It works like charm on my VM but today I have been trying since last 3 hrs to install it but I can not configure the network options .. Is there no dynamic IP option ? Static IP doesn't work for me ..

[Architect]

A. You have not posted an introduction. This will tell us about you and your interests, and how you plan to possibly contribute (not leech) from the fora.

B. Problems like this can be solved via Google, it takes 5 minutes to search the web for an answer to this networking problem.

C. Why did you upload a README file?

[Kulverstukas]

Go ahead and read on Arch forums and Arch wiki. Is all I'm gonna say.

[blackarchmaniac_12]

Bro since I have posted here means I haven't found the solution on google. I have used arch long time but never installed it on hdd. What I am facing is the trouble with static network connectivity and second I found the article from git and posted here to say that I am doing exactly what's written here .

[z3ro]

[blackarchmaniac_12]

If you are a C grade person in your life never get underestimated by the A's because there are two C's in the word"Success" and no A's.

[flowjob]

If you are a C grade person in your life never get underestimated by the A's because there are two C's in the word"Success" and no A's.

lol, you feel better after saying that to yourself?

You don't seem to be the experienced guy when it comes to linux. At least post the error messages so we could know what you are talking about.
Or better switch to some other skid-distro before trying out (black)arch... Ubuntu would be noob-friendly
Point-and-Click everything, install, config, whatev...

[Kulverstukas]

What you have is probably uninitialized network configs or incompatible broadcom drivers if your wifi chip is of Broadcom type. If through wire then you probably didn't init that shit.
Try https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Network_configuration

[blackarchmaniac_12]

Flowjob - Ubuntu is shit it breaks a lot ... Thats the reason I switched to arch its stable..

[flowjob]

Flowjob - Ubuntu is shit it breaks a lot ... Thats the reason I switched to arch its stable..

I wouldn't exactly call archlinux stable. It has bleeding edge software in its repos, and bleeding edge stuff is pretty much never that stable, too many unseen bugs and untested features. My install breaks every few updates, and I spend at least a day trying to find and fix the problem...

If you want something really stable, you should check out other distros. AFAIK, debian is pretty stable.

[voodoo]

Flowjob - Ubuntu is shit it breaks a lot ... Thats the reason I switched to arch its stable..

As an arch linux fanboy myself, I have to say this is not true.  We use Ubuntu deployments all the time in production environments and they are very stable.  If you find Ubuntu less stable than arch you are doing it wrong.  That being said, if you know what you are doing, arch can be stable as well.

Also, as far as installing arch linux, the process is exactly the same as installing it in a virtual environment.  Please refer to the link below for a comprehensive guide on how to install arch linux.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/beginners%27_guide

[zerotohero]

Thanks bro but I found out a way to sort out myself ... My network adapter was not reading because it was dhcp disabled . I turned it on and baaaaam !!! by the way i read on a blog that it mainly for vm and if you want to dump it in arch use the package to submerge it over your arch installation repositories and that way it works the best

[proxx]

Thanks bro but I found out a way to sort out myself ... My network adapter was not reading because it was dhcp disabled . I turned it on and baaaaam !!! by the way i read on a blog that it mainly for vm and if you want to dump it in arch use the package to submerge it over your arch installation repositories and that way it works the best

Im happy for you but whatever you try to say ... ut doesnt make the slightest sense.
DHCP disabled lol

And OP.. is a moron.

[zerotohero]

Yeah I had to figure out in the default firmware section it was DHCP disabled .. I know its moronic but that's not me it my router ... To make sure I altered the selections too and I found out if I turn it off it would cause a problem but if I turn it on put on an open DNS as requested the installation would be successful. Silly but its ironic What to do some things pretty fucking messed up that doesn't have any basic actuality but this is how they work 

[N3mesis]

As an arch linux fanboy myself, I have to say this is not true.  We use Ubuntu deployments all the time in production environments and they are very stable.  If you find Ubuntu less stable than arch you are doing it wrong.  That being said, if you know what you are doing, arch can be stable as well.

Also, as far as installing arch linux, the process is exactly the same as installing it in a virtual environment.  Please refer to the link below for a comprehensive guide on how to install arch linux.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/beginners%27_guide

Agreed. I am also an Arch user, and have been for years. It is as stable as you make it, which in most cases is very unstable because of the n00b using it. I do think that it can be more stable than Ubuntu though, again depending on how you manage it. I keep my system very minimal, which really reduces the chances of something breaking, since there isnt much to break...


As for the OP,

I have used arch long time but never installed it on hdd

...I really cant help you...

If you cant even install arch linux on your system by yourself, this isnt the place for you. Theres even a step by step guide to it as linked above...
My general rule of thumb is dont start posting in a forum until you feel like you can contribute in some way. Thats what noob forums like ubuntu forums or linuxQuestions are for.