Author Topic: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers  (Read 26591 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline 0E 800

  • Not a VIP
  • VIP
  • Baron
  • *
  • Posts: 895
  • Cookies: 131
  • • тнε ιηтεяηεт ιs мү яεcүcℓε-вιη •
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2015, 10:08:28 pm »
Does your intel chipset support packet injection?

This is a basic test to determine if you card successfully supports injection.
Code: [Select]
aireplay-ng -9 wlan0
Review:
http://www.aircrack-ng.org/doku.php?id=injection_test
The invariable mark of wisdom is to see the miraculous in the common.

Offline iTpHo3NiX

  • EZ's Pirate Captain
  • Administrator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2920
  • Cookies: 328
    • View Profile
    • EvilZone
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2015, 10:46:32 pm »
If you're using the latest version of aircrack suite 1.2 rc2+ airmon-ng puts the interface up as wlan0mon. You should probably check my updated tutorial. The link is in my signature
« Last Edit: July 24, 2015, 01:05:21 am by DeepCopy »
[09:27] (+lenoch) iTpHo3NiX can even manipulate me to suck dick
[09:27] (+lenoch) oh no that's voluntary
[09:27] (+lenoch) sorry

Offline ptales

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • Cookies: 10
  • Perfected Imperfection
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2015, 05:02:06 am »
0E 800 found the problem, I guess =\
This is what aireplay-ng -9 wlan0 returns
Code: [Select]
ioctl(SIOCSIWMODE) failed: Device or resource busy


ARP linktype is set to 1 (Ethernet) - expected ARPHRD_IEEE80211,
ARPHRD_IEEE80211_FULL or ARPHRD_IEEE80211_PRISM instead.  Make
sure RFMON is enabled: run 'airmon-ng start wlan0 <#>'
Sysfs injection support was not found either.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2015, 05:02:23 am by ptales »
'Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.'

Offline iTpHo3NiX

  • EZ's Pirate Captain
  • Administrator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2920
  • Cookies: 328
    • View Profile
    • EvilZone
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2015, 03:22:18 pm »
ptales,

What WiFi chipset do you have? You may need to use different drivers, can't help much if you don't have the right drivers.

You need to start airmon-ng interface# then run aireplay on the monitor interface to see if injection is supported
[09:27] (+lenoch) iTpHo3NiX can even manipulate me to suck dick
[09:27] (+lenoch) oh no that's voluntary
[09:27] (+lenoch) sorry

Offline ptales

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • Cookies: 10
  • Perfected Imperfection
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2015, 05:21:44 pm »
My WLAN card is the Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6235 and all I could find regarding the chipset is that it uses a chipset from the Intel 7 series (I guess it's the Q77). The driver is iwlwifi. Running aireplay on the monitor interface  returns "name not unique on network" - running it on wlan0, as suggested by 0E 800, works (see below). I hope this information is usable (and I'm not behaving completely dumb).

Again, thanks for your replies! :)
« Last Edit: July 22, 2015, 05:22:12 pm by ptales »
'Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.'

Offline 0E 800

  • Not a VIP
  • VIP
  • Baron
  • *
  • Posts: 895
  • Cookies: 131
  • • тнε ιηтεяηεт ιs мү яεcүcℓε-вιη •
    • View Profile
The invariable mark of wisdom is to see the miraculous in the common.

Offline ptales

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • Cookies: 10
  • Perfected Imperfection
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #21 on: July 22, 2015, 08:06:56 pm »
Thought about getting one of them for quite a while now and I guess now I'll finally do it. Thanks for the link! :)
'Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.'

Offline proxx

  • Avatarception
  • Global Moderator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2803
  • Cookies: 256
  • ФФФ
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #22 on: July 23, 2015, 03:58:55 pm »
Worst card ever.
Wtf where you thinking with that signature? - Phage.
This was another little experiment *evillaughter - Proxx.
Evilception... - Phage

Offline ptales

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • Cookies: 10
  • Perfected Imperfection
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #23 on: July 23, 2015, 04:29:26 pm »
Yeah, this machine was a gift so I couldn't choose ;)


My Alfa AWUS036H should arrive tomorrow, anyway! :)
'Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.'

Offline 0E 800

  • Not a VIP
  • VIP
  • Baron
  • *
  • Posts: 895
  • Cookies: 131
  • • тнε ιηтεяηεт ιs мү яεcүcℓε-вιη •
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #24 on: July 23, 2015, 06:40:43 pm »
Worst card ever.

036h? That thing has been steady workhorse for me. I would appreciate if you would recommend a better model for wifi auditing.
The invariable mark of wisdom is to see the miraculous in the common.

Offline ptales

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • Cookies: 10
  • Perfected Imperfection
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #25 on: July 23, 2015, 06:43:15 pm »
I thought he meant my Intel Centrino? Heard only great things about the Alfa so far. If you, proxx, indeed meant the Alfa, are you sure you used an original? People say there are tons of fakes out there.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2015, 06:43:51 pm by ptales »
'Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.'

Offline proxx

  • Avatarception
  • Global Moderator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2803
  • Cookies: 256
  • ФФФ
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #26 on: July 23, 2015, 10:50:34 pm »
Its the most unstable piece of shit out there let alone the drivers which are way worse.
To blast some deauths over the airwaves is cute but shit ... a stable connection is almost impossible to achive with this card.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2015, 10:51:07 pm by proxx »
Wtf where you thinking with that signature? - Phage.
This was another little experiment *evillaughter - Proxx.
Evilception... - Phage

Offline 0E 800

  • Not a VIP
  • VIP
  • Baron
  • *
  • Posts: 895
  • Cookies: 131
  • • тнε ιηтεяηεт ιs мү яεcүcℓε-вιη •
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #27 on: July 23, 2015, 11:17:35 pm »
What card would you recommend as an alternative?

Thanks 0pt1musPr1m3

This one has same chipset, might be worth trying.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00EFLKNJI?psc=1


Staff Note: No double posting
« Last Edit: October 15, 2015, 04:39:25 am by iTpHo3NiX »
The invariable mark of wisdom is to see the miraculous in the common.

Offline proxx

  • Avatarception
  • Global Moderator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2803
  • Cookies: 256
  • ФФФ
    • View Profile
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #28 on: July 24, 2015, 12:24:17 am »
Hunt for atheros, out of the box mon mode supported by atheros, what more do you need.
Most stable shit ever and just works , I have one of those PCI cards around that is awesome but also I obtained a bunch of high end pci mini or whatever it is called, atheros chipts , these things can pump out 1 watt if it is power you are honrny for, I prefer modules that are stable but these seem to do both(for those who dont get the hint, you can put it in your laptop............really??yes)
I promise I will check the labels and post details if anyone cares (ubiquity iirc)
There are alfa cards out there with such chips.

I had a bunch of those rtl 'uberhaxxorcards' , they all sorta died on me trying to download a file which is nearly impossible.
They get hot for no reason , I had 1 replaced etc, dont get me fucking started on alpha ffs.
Tried different antenna's , distance , you name it I tried it.
Even used windows to see if it would matter the slightest, I'm pretty sure its worse.

THE DRIVERS BLOW, just saying.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2015, 12:30:25 am by proxx »
Wtf where you thinking with that signature? - Phage.
This was another little experiment *evillaughter - Proxx.
Evilception... - Phage

Offline iTpHo3NiX

  • EZ's Pirate Captain
  • Administrator
  • Titan
  • *
  • Posts: 2920
  • Cookies: 328
    • View Profile
    • EvilZone
Re: Using pixiewps on vulnerable chipset routers
« Reply #29 on: July 24, 2015, 01:03:22 am »
I'm going to have to agree with ProxX, Atheros is my favorite, I love the ath9k drivers, stability and performance. Always had stability issues with rtl chipset cards
[09:27] (+lenoch) iTpHo3NiX can even manipulate me to suck dick
[09:27] (+lenoch) oh no that's voluntary
[09:27] (+lenoch) sorry