It's not an optimal solution, every replay is right. Tor is good just for browsing for information ( perspective of normal user-usage ), and maybe for instant messing ( 512 AES & 2048 RSA for Keysharing would also be more than enough I guess). I'm just little overwhelmed by the big amount of flaws which maybe leads to compromising my privacy: Mini-Autoloaded-Links of Google and Facebook placed on websites of which I never had an idea they would link to them and hence delivery my browsing habits - there, I could block all ip-ranges they use for this links or just by browsing tor... e.g.
I hate this upcoming way of thinking of the concerns. >>Hide the espionage and no one lose his mind...<<
Maybe I'm crazy enough to punish myself by trying to be untraceable by simultaneously holding most of my browsing habits - fortunately I'm an "e- nomad" and are not linked very hard to special sites or services.
Personally I don't use facebook/whatsapp or anything else, which is sacrificed enough ( in social life perspective
) to invest even more work on it and learn this stuff to prevent all unnecessary privacy-breaches at all - that I use all of theme and force everyone I know to do the same shit is very unlikely and should be situational.
If I see people who aren't willed or even able to learn this stuff they have two options: Spread their data or don't us the Internet.
In short my goals are: get fluent with privacy-securing-methods, serve this security to people ( family e.g.). Maybe I have to search for the middle course, because I don't believe this will work perfectly and forever,even on my own.
I hope this should clear up my intentions, because I really shot this raw unthoughtful idea in this forum because I believed there is a mediumeasy-install-and-go solution. Tor isn't enough and should be linked with other services to set of habits and knowledge about how to use theme.
When everything was pointless in the end I still would have learned to "hide my tracks" if I need to do so.
overflow: Every new solution leads to a deeper and more fundamental ( maybe necessary) solution which absence could compromise the solution before. Your right. This leads me to the "middle course"-thoughts.
But your anti ISP setup sounds very interesting, I will focus on it when I feel comport with the basics.
Thank you for input so far.