Author Topic: Fetus = Parazite?  (Read 14675 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline z3ro

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 345
  • Cookies: 60
    • View Profile
Fetus = Parazite?
« on: August 23, 2012, 05:55:02 pm »

I know this sound stupid, but....


According to a biology book I was reading.
here's the definition of a parasite: "An animal or plant that lives in or on a host (another animal or hplant); it obtains nourishment from the host without benefiting or killing the host."  RIGHT?


I then realied that : A fetus seems to meet this definition.  :o


Has the book got the definition wrong?
~ God is real. Unless declared as an integer.

Offline kateus

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Posts: 89
  • Cookies: 11
  • scientia potentia est
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2012, 06:08:31 pm »
That sounds about right...  ;D


But you could argue that the woman is benefiting by having her DNA being passed on to the next generation. There also may be more benefits, such as the benefits of childbirth, etc. So while it's close, and fetuses do leech of the mother's body, the mother gets something out of it.

Offline namespace7

  • Sir
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
  • Cookies: 115
  • My Brother's Keeper
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2012, 06:12:54 pm »
Completely wrong, because a parasite is not wanted by the host and comes to the host without the interaction of the host. This is not the case with a baby.
"A programmer’s greatest enemy isn’t the tools or the boss or the artists or the design or the legacy code or the third party code or the API or the OS. A programmer’s greatest enemy is getting stuck.
Therefore a crucial step to becoming a better programmer is learning how to avoid getting stuck, to recognize when you’re stuck, and to get unstuck." -Jeff Wofford

Offline z3ro

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 345
  • Cookies: 60
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2012, 06:28:25 pm »

Completely wrong, because a parasite is not wanted by the host and comes to the host without the interaction of the host. This is not the case with a baby.


I do know that!


so, the books got the definition wrong then?


Quote
A parasite is an organism that has sustained contact with another organism to the detriment of the host organism.


That one's from wikipedia
~ God is real. Unless declared as an integer.

Offline namespace7

  • Sir
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
  • Cookies: 115
  • My Brother's Keeper
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2012, 06:35:07 pm »
Anyway, a fetus is not a parasite. Not even biologically, because it has obligatory dependent relationship with the host. The association with the mother is also temporary and part of a process which originates within the host.

Calling fetus a parasite is like calling a text editor a virus because it consumes system resources.
"A programmer’s greatest enemy isn’t the tools or the boss or the artists or the design or the legacy code or the third party code or the API or the OS. A programmer’s greatest enemy is getting stuck.
Therefore a crucial step to becoming a better programmer is learning how to avoid getting stuck, to recognize when you’re stuck, and to get unstuck." -Jeff Wofford

Offline Kulverstukas

  • Administrator
  • Zeus
  • *
  • Posts: 6627
  • Cookies: 542
  • Fascist dictator
    • View Profile
    • My blog
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2012, 06:50:41 pm »
Completely wrong, because a parasite is not wanted by the host and comes to the host without the interaction of the host. This is not the case with a baby.
Ok then, if the baby wasn't planned, then it's classified as Parasite?

IMO babies - unborn or born, are parasites.

Offline namespace7

  • Sir
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
  • Cookies: 115
  • My Brother's Keeper
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2012, 07:50:58 pm »
Oh, come on, don't be so cruel and heartless.
"A programmer’s greatest enemy isn’t the tools or the boss or the artists or the design or the legacy code or the third party code or the API or the OS. A programmer’s greatest enemy is getting stuck.
Therefore a crucial step to becoming a better programmer is learning how to avoid getting stuck, to recognize when you’re stuck, and to get unstuck." -Jeff Wofford

Offline z3ro

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 345
  • Cookies: 60
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2012, 05:07:55 am »
Haahha  :P   OF course man, we DO know that a fetus is a future Human Being.. so it's not really a 'parasite'... but that definition just struck me hard..   ;)
~ God is real. Unless declared as an integer.

Offline p_2001

  • Royal Highness
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
  • Cookies: -64
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2012, 05:35:39 am »
A fetus is a future parasite.
"Always have a plan"

Offline z3ro

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 345
  • Cookies: 60
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2012, 05:33:39 pm »
A fetus is a future parasite.


 :o  future?
~ God is real. Unless declared as an integer.

Offline p_2001

  • Royal Highness
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
  • Cookies: -64
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2012, 06:03:05 pm »
Oh yes... See the fetus is nurtured by the mother... Loved and taken care of with her own blood.  Then it is delivered and we find an innocent baby... The baby demands nothing other than what's natural and well within its rights... Then as it grows up... It turns into a leech.. Selfish, mean, cheap cruel, harsh, violent and destructive... It takes from the world and keeps taking..never giving anything back.. That is why i said a future parasite.
"Always have a plan"

Offline z3ro

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 345
  • Cookies: 60
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2012, 06:22:17 pm »
Oh yes... See the fetus is nurtured by the mother... Loved and taken care of with her own blood.  Then it is delivered and we find an innocent baby... The baby demands nothing other than what's natural and well within its rights... Then as it grows up... It turns into a leech.. Selfish, mean, cheap cruel, harsh, violent and destructive... It takes from the world and keeps taking..never giving anything back.. That is why i said a future parasite.


You can't possibly say this holds true for every baby, Right?
~ God is real. Unless declared as an integer.

Offline Kulverstukas

  • Administrator
  • Zeus
  • *
  • Posts: 6627
  • Cookies: 542
  • Fascist dictator
    • View Profile
    • My blog
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2012, 06:29:05 pm »
Oh this is true. What p_2001 said is... very, very true.
Babies are parasites. No one can say otherwise.

Offline p_2001

  • Royal Highness
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
  • Cookies: -64
    • View Profile
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2012, 07:53:05 pm »

You can't possibly say this holds true for every baby, Right?
???

i can... Tell me, how many people give more than they take? Out of 7 billion contenders? Name just 7.
That Steve jobs that Americans worship?
Our maybe Einstein?
Buddha? Mahavira... Christ? Who?

While the fetus is not a parasite... The final product is.
"Always have a plan"

Offline techb

  • Soy Sauce Feeler
  • Global Moderator
  • King
  • *
  • Posts: 2350
  • Cookies: 345
  • Aliens do in fact wear hats.
    • View Profile
    • github
Re: Fetus = Parazite?
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2012, 01:51:01 pm »
I see it as a parasite. The baby does not give back to the mother other than furthering generations. Which is not entirely a good thing, seeing how the world is over populated in the first place.

The baby causes physical harm and damage, back problems, malnutrition, sciatica, organ damage, etc... Plus, the mother can die giving birth because of all the ripping and blood loss.

Even after birth, you have post parden depression, and it leeching further resources. Sever sleep loss, stress levels unheard of, and money and time being sucked from the parents. All this to hopefully seeing the child successful in life. Which is only up to the child, so 18+ years could have been for nothing and you wasted half your life to a lost cause.
>>>import this
-----------------------------