Author Topic: SMTP Authentication workaround  (Read 1553 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline m1kesanders

  • Serf
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Cookies: -5
  • I'm sarcastic, somewhat new, and a grey hat
    • View Profile
SMTP Authentication workaround
« on: March 30, 2013, 10:52:29 pm »
Ok so I'm editing an email bomber I designed to make it more secure/untracable, well I did a urllib2 command so that each instance is handeled by a proxy (at least I think) well anyway I was hoping if anyone knew of a workaround so you don;t have to put in a password and just do a username. Basically I'm asking is if theres a code or something in python that someone has writen to make the smtp server believe that the person has an account so that the email is sent?

Offline techb

  • Soy Sauce Feeler
  • Global Moderator
  • King
  • *
  • Posts: 2350
  • Cookies: 345
  • Aliens do in fact wear hats.
    • View Profile
    • github
Re: SMTP Authentication workaround
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2013, 11:30:17 pm »
Setup your own, or google SMTP no authentication.
>>>import this
-----------------------------

Offline relax

  • Sir
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
  • Cookies: 114
  • The one and only
    • View Profile
Re: SMTP Authentication workaround
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2013, 08:05:03 am »
Setup your own, or google SMTP no authentication.


actually google requires authentication now it seems like.
and even if they did not I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be able to use them to mail bomb because of filters and shit
check this list http://www.e-eeasy.com/SMTPServerList.aspx
« Last Edit: March 31, 2013, 08:05:21 am by relax »

Offline Kulverstukas

  • Administrator
  • Zeus
  • *
  • Posts: 6627
  • Cookies: 542
  • Fascist dictator
    • View Profile
    • My blog
Re: SMTP Authentication workaround
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2013, 08:08:47 am »
try miniRelay for a local SMTP server.

Offline Axon

  • VIP
  • King
  • *
  • Posts: 2047
  • Cookies: 319
    • View Profile
Re: SMTP Authentication workaround
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2013, 09:17:58 am »
Isn't email bombers old nowadays, or I'm just hallucinating?

Offline Kulverstukas

  • Administrator
  • Zeus
  • *
  • Posts: 6627
  • Cookies: 542
  • Fascist dictator
    • View Profile
    • My blog
Re: SMTP Authentication workaround
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2013, 09:21:32 am »
Isn't email bombers old nowadays, or I'm just hallucinating?
Lol they kinda are...

Offline techb

  • Soy Sauce Feeler
  • Global Moderator
  • King
  • *
  • Posts: 2350
  • Cookies: 345
  • Aliens do in fact wear hats.
    • View Profile
    • github
Re: SMTP Authentication workaround
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2013, 02:06:51 pm »

actually google requires authentication now it seems like.
and even if they did not I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be able to use them to mail bomb because of filters and shit
check this list http://www.e-eeasy.com/SMTPServerList.aspx

I guess this is one of those cases where punctuation is important. Let me try again.

Set up your own or Google the term "smtp no authentication".
>>>import this
-----------------------------

Offline relax

  • Sir
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
  • Cookies: 114
  • The one and only
    • View Profile
Re: SMTP Authentication workaround
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2013, 06:42:12 pm »
I guess this is one of those cases where punctuation is important. Let me try again.

Set up your own or Google the term "smtp no authentication".


that makes more sense ^_^


though setting up your own would revile your real IP, open mail relay would probably do the same so a vpn/proxy maybe?

Offline m1kesanders

  • Serf
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Cookies: -5
  • I'm sarcastic, somewhat new, and a grey hat
    • View Profile
Re: SMTP Authentication workaround
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2013, 09:36:13 am »
Lol they kinda are...
ya they are, it's not like an sms bomber which i'm also designing, but if you think about it most companies (small and sometimes big) communicate through email, so if you received poor service or was just being a dick you bombing their email would cripple them the most (besides actually breaking into their site and such)